Koala Clarity – Gurmesh Singh Explains His Party’s Position On Koala Habitat

Gurmesh Singh argues that satellite photos such as this show that koala habitat may not be correctly identified. Photo: NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment.

 

RECENT state media sources have focussed on threats by the National Party to withdraw from the Coalition because of problems with the State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) pertaining to koala habitat.

UnrealestateAdvertise with News of The Area today.
It’s worth it for your business.
Message us.
Phone us – (02) 4981 8882.
Email us – [email protected]

The Member for Coffs Harbour, Gurmesh Singh, was one of the parliamentarians who initially threatened to sit on the cross benches over the issue.

Mr Singh spoke to News Of The Area about his and the National Party’s current position.

Mr. Singh stated that, the previous week, agreement was reached about debating the SEPP in a cabinet meeting.

His perspective is that detailed investigation of biodiversity maps appears to show areas in Coffs Harbour CBD that are labelled core koala habitat.

According to Mr. Singh, Riding Lane and inside the International Stadium are areas marked.

Mr. Singh said that the SEPP maps showgrounds, stadiums, roundabouts and urban areas as core koala habitat.

An example he cited was that the centre of the Mudgee Showgrounds is marked, when it is just grass.

Therefore, he maintains, there appears to be mistakes in the maps used to classify land as core koala habitat.

Mr. Singh said that the National Party is not opposed to actual core koala habitat being identified and mapped but the identification must be accurate.

“It is important to protect koalas and we stand right behind that.”

He went on to say that other aspects of the guidelines also need to be examined more carefully.

Mr. Singh said that a study of koala habitats graded tree species into five categories.

He stated that all five categories are listed in the SEPP and even species categorised as unsuitable were included.

He said that the National Party is asking that only higher suitability trees be included.

Mr. Singh’s stance over who is responsible for paying for ecological assessments has not changed.

According to him, the SEPP states that a landowner must pay a consultant if they wish to challenge a classification, which, in his opinion, is unfair.

He also said that the National Party wants to protect existing koala habitat including from bushfires.

This entails better management of National Parks, but what this looks like requires more consideration.

Mr. Singh finished by saying that many people were initially angry about the National Party’s stance, but, after discussions, have realised that the SEPP could be improved.

“That is all we have ever asked for”, he said.

 

By Andrew VIVIAN

One thought on “Koala Clarity – Gurmesh Singh Explains His Party’s Position On Koala Habitat

  1. An irrelevant man from an irrelevant party that is in disarray. This issue is about farmers rights to develop land with Koala habitat and not have to have checks and balances. Nothing more nothing less. Follow the money.

Leave a Reply to Karen lagalla Cancel reply

Top